Kano Emirate Tussle: Atiku Faults FG’s Deployment of Soldiers

Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has raised concerns regarding the federal government’s decision to deploy soldiers to Kano in response to Alhaji Ado Bayero’s deposition as the emir. He argues that this action breaches the nation’s Constitution and undermines the peace and security of the state.

Atiku’s Observations

In a statement released by his media adviser, Paul Ibe, Atiku highlighted the constitutional powers exercised by the Kano State House of Assembly (KSHA) in passing the amended Kano State Emirate Council (Repeal) Bill 2024. Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf then signed the bill into law, ultimately repealing the 2019 version that divided the Kano Emirate into five.

Atiku contends that the former emir’s return to Kano would not have been possible without the federal government’s support and military involvement. This intervention, he argues, contradicts the state’s constitutional processes and compromises the integrity of the military.

Upholding Constitutional Processes

The Kano State House of Assembly’s enactment of the amended emirate council bill was in accordance with Section 4 of the 1999 Constitution as Amended. Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf’s subsequent approval of the law, along with consultations with the Kingmakers of Kano, led to the reappointment of Muhammadu Sanusi II as the Emir of Kano.
Despite these legal proceedings, the deployment of soldiers to facilitate the former emir’s entry into the Nasarawa Palace raises concerns about extra-constitutional interference and the potential for destabilizing the state’s peace and harmony.

Peaceful Transition and Responsibility

Atiku emphasizes Kano’s historical reputation for peace and unity, pointing to the peaceful transition following Muhammadu Sanusi II’s dethronement in 2020. He warns that any disruption in law and order within Kano, particularly in Kano Municipal, could be attributed to the federal government’s actions in supporting the former emir’s return.

In light of these developments, Atiku asserts that the federal government should be held accountable for any potential breakdown of peace in Kano, cautioning against actions that could incite unrest and turmoil in the region.

Conclusion

The recent events surrounding the emir tussle in Kano have sparked debates on constitutional adherence, the role of the federal government, and the preservation of peace and stability within the state. Atiku Abubakar’s observations shed light on the complexities of this situation and underscore the importance of upholding legal processes and respecting the autonomy of state institutions.

In navigating future challenges, both local and federal authorities must prioritize dialogue, collaboration, and respect for constitutional provisions to ensure a harmonious and secure environment for all residents of Kano and beyond. The need for transparency, accountability, and adherence to the rule of law remains paramount in addressing contentious issues and fostering a climate of trust and unity within the region.